A Protective Award of 90 days pay, the maximum the law can provide, was awarded after the tribunal found that receivers Ernst & Young had failed to consult with both the GPMU and Amicus before announcing the redundancies.
At the time, GPMU deputy general secretary Tony Burke had said the redundancies, which amounted to a quarter of the workforce, were totally ruthless.
Burke said the result was a vindication of the unions decision to take legal action.
The behaviour of Ernst & Young was appalling, with many members dismissed at a moments notice, he said.
The former employees were based at Imperial Home Dcors Crown Wallcoverings plant in Darwen, Lancashire.
Crown Wallcoverings went into administrative receivership in last this year with the loss of 212 jobs.
The company appointed Ernst & Young as administrative receivers, after a restructuring of its business failed to leave it with enough adequate working capital to keep it trading.
by Andy Scott
Have your say in the Printweek Poll
Related stories
Latest comments
"Very insightful Stern.
My analysis?
Squeaky bum time!"
"But in April there was an article with the Headline "Landa boosts top team as it scales up to meet market demand", where they said they came out of last year’s Drupa with a burgeoning order..."
"Yep. Tracked is king."
Up next...

Print services required
Trio of new tenders up for grabs

Greater automation and ease-of-use
Konica Minolta enhances AccurioPress C7100 series

Energy savings and wider gamut
Wilmot-Budgen takes first LED Onset

Weekly one million mark