Search Jobs

Sponsored by Mercury

Job of the day

Operations Manager - London

Up to £79k baisc

Central London

Business Directory

Poll

Do you think the PBR will help the print industry?

 

In this issue

Webcast promo
Printing World features list 2009
Buyers' Guide 2008
PrintWeek features list 2008

News

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Paperlinx under fire for adding 1% fuel levy per drop

Paperlinx has been criticised by printers following its decision to instigate a fuel charge of 1% per drop across its UK operating companies, to combat rising oil prices.

The charges are the first time the merchant has imposed such a levy, which it said is an attempt to mitigate some of the impact of a 37% increase in the cost of diesel fuel.

It said it wants to be open with customers rather than "hide behind paper price increases".

However, some printers have criticised the move. Geoff Grindley, senior estimator at the Square Group, said: "I, like many others, feel we just have to accept a third increase this year."

Alex Greenman, sales director at Axis Printing in West Yorkshire, said: "Paper is the largest single component in the cost of producing virtually any job so the effect on our gross margins is considerable.

"Whether the merchants call it a fuel increase or a paper price increase is immaterial, the end result is the same."

The additional fuel charge issued by the merchants operating under parent Paperlinx, PaperCo, Robert Horne Group and Howard Smith Paper, is an increase of around £1.93 to the average delivery.

Paperlinx regional president Dave Allen defended the move saying the company simply cannot absorb these costs into the business.

"No-one could have predicted fuel prices to reach this level – which equates to an increase in our costs of £2m in the last 12 months.

"We will continue to monitor fuel pricing and hope that this measure is just a short-term initiative."

Dave Hodgson, managing director of Kelvin Print Group, said Allen's comments are understandable.

"If only printing companies could do the same thing," he said. "There is a great degree of sense that comes out of paper companies as they try to make sure their pricing policy allows them to still be in business tomorrow.

"We in the print sector should look more closely at how the paper companies achieve price increases."

Peter Ellis, Unite national officer, paper and board, said paper merchants are struggling because of fuel price increases.

"The impact of the increase in fuel prices is not new and everyone is suffering from an increase in fuel costs."

In June, the price of oil soared to almost $150 (£84) a barrel driven by concerns about supply and increased tensions in the Middle East. While it has now fallen by almost a third, it will take some time for the price of fuel to reflect the reduction.

Last month, Paperlinx increased the price of its paper by between six and 11% in the face of rising raw material and energy costs.

PaperCo, Robert Horne Group and Howard Smith Paper said they have had to cover the costs of continuing paper manufacturers' increases, which are up by 10%.

Comments

Mick Hart - 04 September 2008

This is all fine, especially as printers cannot manage without paper. What everyone seems to forget however, especially paper merchants, is that the end user can now manage quite well without print - hence the state of our industry.

Steve Carter - 04 September 2008

Yesterday oil prices dropped to a low of $105, but the city thinks prices will be around $115-$120 for most of next year; well below the peak price of $150. Pricing initiatives like this one at Paperlinx need to reflect actual costs if they are to be accepted. Of course don't forget there will be Carbon levies and taxes imposed on all parts of the supply chain in the near future, costs which will be passed on up the chain. It will be imperative that printers find a way to implement price increases and cover their costs.

Mark Snee - 05 September 2008

I don't have a problem with a fuel surcharge as a means of cost recovery or as a means of reducing energy consumption, but an across the board levy on the invoice value fools no-one since it fails to address the real issue.

The right way to do this is to charge a flat fee per delivery, or on tonnage with a minimum charge, or on mileage. That links the charge directly with the actual cost of the delivery / fuel.

Why should I be paying more for pallet loads of paper transported five miles from PaperCo's Leeds branch than someone 50 miles away who may be receiving a couple of reams?

Chris Lewis - 09 September 2008

This seems to be a strange approach in that an across the board 1% levy would not seem to be the fairest approach. The most logical & greenest approach would be to charge per delivery based on mileage. However, I can see this meaning lost sales for the merchant as their competitors could maintain their "free" delivery service, so I am guessing that the 1% fuel levy is the only way forward.

As with most things during this credit crunch, we are all having to start to pay the real cost of things!

To post comments please log in here